MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402063011 · doi:10.58411/xp4qp074

PENYUSUNAN MONITORING DAN EVALUASI RENCANA INDUK KELITBANGAN TAHUN 2022

2023· article· id· W4402063011 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePANGRIPTA · 2023
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldComputer Science
TopicMultimedia Learning Systems
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
FundersTenaga Nasional Berhad
KeywordsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sesuai dengan Peraturan Menteri Dalam Negeri Republik Indonesia Nomor 17 Tahun 2016 Tentang Pedoman Penelitian dan Pengembangan di Kementerian Dalam Negeri dan Pemerintahan Daerah, untuk menjalankan fungsi kelitbangan, perlu disusun kerangka kebijakan kelitbangan pemerintah dalam negeri dan pemerintah daerah yang mengakomodir berbagai aspek penyelenggaraan pemerintahan dalam suatu konsep rencana kelitbangan secara komprehensif dan sinergis. Dinas Pekerjaan Umum, Penataan Ruang, Perumahan dan Kawasan Permukiman memiliki persentase terbesar yaitu 10% sedangkan Unit Pelaksana Teknis Laboratorium Lingkungan memiliki persentase terkecil yaitu 1%. Persentase implementasi Rencana Program/Kegiatan Kelitbangan mengalami kenaikan pada Tahun 2019 sebesar 71,07% menjadi 80,86% pada Tahun 2020, selanjutnya 94,81% pada Tahun 2021 kemudian di Tahun 2022 sebesar 99,30% dan naik lagi sebesar 100% di Tahun 2023.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.405
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it