MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402063190 · doi:10.58411/qk7dr809

PENGUKURAN INDIKATOR PROGRAM PEMBANGUNAN BIDANG EKONOMI KOTA MALANG TAHUN 2021

2022· article· id· W4402063190 on OpenAlexaff
Bidang Penelitian dan Pengembangan

Bibliographic record

VenuePANGRIPTA · 2022
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicEconomic Growth and Fiscal Policies
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pengukuran Indikator Program Pembangunan Bidang Ekonomi Kota Malang bertujuan sebagai tolak ukur Pemerintah Kota Malang dalam melaksanakan program baru yang terdapat dalam periode Rancangan Peraturan Daerah Perubahan RPJMD Kota Malang Tahun 2018-2023. Adanya penyesuaian program dan target pada RPJMD Kota Malang terbaru, artinya dibutuhkan peta transisi program masing-masing urusan dari bentuk program yang lama ke program yang baru. Bidang ekonomi merupakan salah satu perwujudan misi Rancangan Peraturan Derah Perubahan RPJMD Kota Malang nomor 2 yaitu Mewujudkan Kota Produktif dan Berdaya Saing Berbasis Ekonomi Kreatif, Keberlanjutan dan Keterpaduan. Pengukuran indikator program pembangunan bidang ekonomi meliputi pengukuran pertumbuhan ekonomi, kesempatan kerja dan infrastruktur ekonomi serta evaluasi target dan capaian pembangunan pada urusan kegiatan ekonomi Kota Malang. Analisa yang digunakan ialah analisa indikator pembangunan ekonomi dan evaluasi target capaian program bidang ekonomi. Pada tahun 2020, terdapat sebesar 67% indikator program ekonomi yang telah dilaksanakan dengan tingkat efektivitas sangat tinggi oleh masing-masing perangkat daerah. Indikator tersebut telah diwujudkan dengan berbagai kegiatan dan realisasi yang telah melebihi target.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.048
Threshold uncertainty score0.127

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0380.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePANGRIPTASame topicEconomic Growth and Fiscal PoliciesFrench-language works237,207