REVIEW TARGET DAN CAPAIAN INDEKS PROGRAM PEMBANGUNAN BIDANG EKONOMI
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Kebijakan evaluasi dokumen perencanaan dapat dilakukan setiap tahun atau waktu tertentu dengan mempertimbangkan dinamika yang terjadi, salah satunya pandemi Covid-19 yang berdampak pada refocusing dan realokasi anggaran. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah mereview target dan capian indeks program pembangunan bidang ekonomi. Metode analisis yang digunakan adalah analisis komparasi dan analisis akar masalah. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa dinamika pandemic Covid-19 diperkirakan akan mempengaruhi capaian indeks program pembangunan bidang ekonomi. Kondisi ini juga dihadapkan pada permasalahan-permasalahan sektoral/bidang yang masih belum terselesaikan sebelum era pandemi. Hasil review target pembangunan mengindikasikan bahwa indeks program pembangunan bidang ekonomi pada tahun 2020 tidak akan tercapai karena terjadi pergeseran, penundaan bahkan penghapusan program yang pendanaanya dialihkan ke penanganan dampak covid-19.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it