MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402070628 · doi:10.18535/ijsrm/v12i08.sh02

Active Mobility Assessment in the City of Bamenda

2024· article· en· W4402070628 on OpenAlexaff
Tachi Cliford Kwenui, Steffel Ludivin Tezong Feudjio, Stephen Kome Fondzenyuy, Sergio Celestino, Davide Shingo Usami

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Scientific Research and Management (IJSRM) · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSoil and Land Suitability Analysis
Canadian institutionsTransport Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Embarking on active mobility strategies, by promoting cycling and walking as transport modes in combination with public transport to facilitate longer distances can greatly influence cities' livability. Active mobility forms part of Sustainable Urban Mobility Planning. The inadequacy of sidewalks, which include narrow, uneven, obstructed, or even absent sidewalks, poses significant challenges and safety risks for pedestrians, who are among the most vulnerable road users. The study aimed at examining the active mobility infrastructure in the city of Bamenda and identifying the various barriers involved. Quantitative and qualitative data were collected through survey, inspection, interviews as well as secondary data sources. A sample size of 250 was used to represent the population of the focus area and considering the parameters on the checklist used, the average adequacy, which represents the qualitative score of the active mobility infrastructure for the six areas surveyed, was rated at 6.31 percent. Walking is the mode of travel predominantly used in the city of Bamenda as almost half of the total daily trips (48.8%) are made on foot in combination with taxis but unfortunately, initiatives have focused on roads and intersections meant for motorist travel and not on a systematic diagnosis of active mobility, especially sidewalk safety. The roads in the city are poorly designed with streetlights, pedestrian crossings, and sidewalks visibly absent or partially obstructed by permanent obstacles and street vendors. Traffic safety is the leading factor, with a significant influence of 82.0% on active mobility. Good health is another important factor influencing the preference for walking or cycling, with a score of 70.40%. Thus, traffic safety and good health are interconnected factors that significantly influence the preference for walking or cycling in Bamenda. Consequently, pedestrian infrastructure need urgent improvement while cycling facilities are still to be conceived and implemented in the city by the policymakers. Thus, active mobility reduces reliance on private vehicles, alleviates traffic congestion, contributing to a more sustainable transportation system by lowering greenhouse gas emissions and reducing air pollution.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.592
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.399
Teacher spread0.340 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Scientific Research and Management (IJSRM)Same topicSoil and Land Suitability AnalysisFrench-language works237,207