Magnetic black holes in 4D Einstein–Gauss–Bonnet massive gravity coupled to nonlinear electrodynamics
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We investigated Einstein–Gauss–Bonnet (EGB) 4D massive gravity coupled to nonlinear electrodynamics (NED) in an anti-de Sitter (AdS) background and found an exact magnetically charged black hole solution. The metric function was analyzed for different values of massive gravity parameters. The first law of black hole thermodynamics and generalized Smarr formula were verified, where we treated the cosmological constant as thermodynamic pressure. We defined vacuum polarization as the conjugate to NED parameter. To analyze the local stability of the black hole, we computed specific heat. We investigated the van der Waals-like/re-entrant phase transition of the black holes and estimated the critical points. We observed small black hole (SBH)/large black hole (LBH) and SBH/intermediate black hole (IBH)/LBH phase transitions. The Joule–Thomson coefficient, inversion, and isenthalpic curves were discussed. Finally, the minimum inversion temperature and the corresponding event horizon radius were obtained using numerical techniques.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".