Maximizing Rice Yields through Heterosis: Exploring the Genetic Basis and Breeding Strategies
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Maximizing rice yields is essential for ensuring global food security, especially in the face of increasing population pressure and climatic challenges. This study explores the potential of heterosis (hybrid vigor) in rice breeding to enhance yield, stress tolerance, and overall crop performance. The study delves into the historical development and key genetic mechanisms underlying heterosis, including dominance, overdominance, and epistasis. Traditional and modern breeding strategies, such as marker-assisted selection (MAS) and genomic selection, are examined for their roles in optimizing hybrid rice production. Advances in genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, and other multi-omics approaches provide a comprehensive understanding of the molecular basis of heterosis, facilitating the development of superior hybrid varieties. The study also addresses the socio-economic and environmental considerations vital for the successful adoption of hybrid rice. Future directions emphasize the integration of CRISPR and synthetic biology, international collaborations, and supportive policy frameworks to enhance the sustainability and impact of hybrid rice breeding programs. By leveraging these advancements, hybrid rice breeding can significantly contribute to global agricultural sustainability and food security.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".