MAKNA FILOSOFI MAKANAN TRADISIONAL BANNANG-BANNANG PADA UPACARA ADAT DI KABUPATEN GOWA
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Penelitian yang bertujuan mendeskripsikan makna filosofi kue tradisional bannang-bannang sebagai sajian dalam berbagai upacara adat pada masyarakat di Kabupaten Gowa. Bannang-bannang merupakan karya budaya yang menjadi warisan leluhur yang perlu dilestarikan, untuk mendapatkan sertifikasi sebagai warisan budaya tak benda, sebagai objek pemajuan kebudayaan dalam Undang-Undang Pemajuan Kebudayaan Nomor 5 Tahun 2017. Kue tradisional bannang-bannang memiliki nilai-nilai budaya dan pengetahuan lokal secara komunal dimiliki masyarakat Gowa. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode deskriptif kualitatif dengan teknik pengumpulan data melalui wawancara, observasi dan dokumentasi dan dianalisis secara kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kue tradisional bannang-bannang merupakan kue tradisional yang selalu disajikan dalam berbagai upacara adat pada masyarakat di Kabupaten Gowa utamanya pada upacara perkawinan adat, karena kue tradisional bannang-bannang memiliki makna filosofi dan simbol kebahagian dalam kehidupan rumah tangga. Bagi masyarakat luar, kue bannang-bannang biasanya dijadikan oleh-oleh ketika berkunjung ke Makassar, karena kue tradisional ini dapat bertahan lama.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.028 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".