MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402073037 · doi:10.1016/j.envres.2024.119893

Transforming drinking water treatment residuals into efficient adsorbents: A review of activation and modification methods

2024· review· en· W4402073037 on OpenAlexafffund
Khaled Zoroufchi Benis

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironmental Research · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAdsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsAdsorptionWater treatmentEnvironmental scienceSustainabilityPollutantBiochemical engineeringChemistryEnvironmental engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The management of drinking water treatment residuals (DWTRs) poses significant environmental and economic challenges for water treatment facilities; however, these residues have considerable potential as effective adsorbents for pollutant removal. The objectives of this review are to evaluate research conducted from 2015 to 2024 on treatment and modification techniques aimed at enhancing DWTRs' efficacy as adsorbents, analyze the influence of preparation methods on DWTRs performance, evaluate DWTRs adsorbents for different pollutants, and discuss the limitations and challenges in DWTRs applications. The review addresses the knowledge gap by detailed analysis of these advanced modification methods, which have not been extensively reviewed before, and their direct impact on the physicochemical properties and adsorption performance of DWTRs. The review explores various methods including thermal treatment, chemical activation, granulation, pelletization, and the development of composite materials. Key findings indicate that thermal treatment significantly increases surface area and porosity, while chemical activation introduces functional groups that enhance adsorption capacity. Composite DWTRs, incorporating metals, organic compounds, or magnetic properties, demonstrate superior performance in adsorbing diverse contaminants such as dyes and heavy metals. Despite these advancements, challenges remain, particularly in reporting the life cycles and costs of the treated and modified DWTRs and the regeneration of spent adsorbents. The review highlights the importance of optimizing preparation techniques to enhance the physicochemical properties and adsorption performance of DWTRs. By synthesizing existing knowledge and identifying key areas for future research, this review aims to advance sustainable practices in water treatment and resource recovery, aligning with global sustainability goals.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.110
GPT teacher head0.445
Teacher spread0.336 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnvironmental ResearchSame topicAdsorption and biosorption for pollutant removalFrench-language works237,207