MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402073352 · doi:10.1142/s0217595924500258

Parameterized Approximations for the Minimum Diameter Vertex-Weighted Steiner Tree Problem in Graphs with Parameterized Weights

2024· article· en· W4402073352 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAsia Pacific Journal of Operational Research · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVLSI and FPGA Design Techniques
Canadian institutionsBrock University
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaZhejiang University of Water Resources and Electric Power
KeywordsParameterized complexitySteiner tree problemVertex (graph theory)MathematicsCombinatoricsTreewidthDiscrete mathematicsGraphComputer sciencePathwidthLine graph

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Let [Formula: see text] be a weighted undirected connected graph, where [Formula: see text] is the set of vertices, [Formula: see text] is the set of edges, [Formula: see text] is a subset of terminals, [Formula: see text] denotes the weight associated with edge [Formula: see text], and [Formula: see text] denotes the weight associated with vertex [Formula: see text]. Let [Formula: see text] be a Steiner tree in [Formula: see text] to interconnect all terminals in [Formula: see text]. For any two terminals, [Formula: see text], we consider the weighted tree distance on [Formula: see text] from [Formula: see text] to [Formula: see text], defined as the weight of [Formula: see text] times the classic tree distance on [Formula: see text] from [Formula: see text] to [Formula: see text]. The longest weighted tree distance on [Formula: see text] between terminals is named the weighted diameter of [Formula: see text]. The Minimum Diameter Vertex-Weighted Steiner Tree Problem (MDWSTP) asks for a Steiner tree in [Formula: see text] of the minimum weighted diameter to interconnect all terminals in [Formula: see text]. In this paper, we introduce two classes of parameterized graphs (PG), [Formula: see text]-PG and [Formula: see text]-PG, in terms of the parameterized upper bound on the ratio of two vertex weights, and a weaker version of the parameterized triangle inequality, respectively, and present approximation algorithms of a parameterized factor for the MDWSTP in them. For the MDWSTP in an edge-weighted [Formula: see text]-PG, we present an approximation algorithm of a parameterized factor [Formula: see text]. For the MDWSTP in a vertex-weighted [Formula: see text]-PG, we first present a simple approximation algorithm of a parameterized factor [Formula: see text], where [Formula: see text] is tight when [Formula: see text], and further develop another approximation algorithm of a slightly improved factor.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.706
Threshold uncertainty score0.443

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it