MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402077505 · doi:10.3390/biom14091087

Perineuronal Net Alterations Following Early-Life Stress: Are Microglia Pulling Some Strings?

2024· review· en· W4402077505 on OpenAlexafffund
Reza Rahimian, Claudia Belliveau, Sophie Simard, Gustavo Turecki, Naguib Mechawar

Bibliographic record

VenueBiomolecules · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityDouglas Mental Health University Institute
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchCanada First Research Excellence FundFondation Brain Canada
KeywordsMicrogliaPerineuronal netNeuroscienceStress (linguistics)Computer scienceBiologyImmunologyInflammationPhilosophyCentral nervous system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The extracellular matrix plays a key role in synapse formation and in the modulation of synaptic function in the central nervous system. Recent investigations have revealed that microglia, the resident immune cells of the brain, are involved in extracellular matrix remodeling under both physiological and pathological conditions. Moreover, the dysregulation of both innate immune responses and the extracellular matrix has been documented in stress-related psychopathologies as well as in relation to early-life stress. However, the dynamics of microglial regulation of the ECM and how it can be impacted by early-life adversity have been understudied. This brief review provides an overview of the recent literature on this topic, drawing from both animal model and human post mortem studies. Direct and indirect mechanisms through which microglia may regulate the extracellular matrix-including perineuronal nets-are presented and discussed in light of the interactions with other cell types.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.079
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiomoleculesSame topicNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration MechanismsFrench-language works237,207