MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402079503 · doi:10.51646/jsesd.v13i2.243

Global Renewable Energy Infrastructure:

2024· article· en· W4402079503 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Syed Saeed, Tanvir Siraj

Bibliographic record

VenueSolar Energy and Sustainable Development · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEnergy and Environment Impacts
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRenewable energyBusinessNatural resource economicsEnvironmental economicsEnvironmental scienceEconomicsEngineeringElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The transition from fossil fuels to renewable energy is crucial for achieving environmental sustainability and carbon neutrality. The research focuses on the global landscape of renewable energy capacity, utilizing data from the 2024 report by the International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA). The data was meticulously cleaned and organized based on countries and renewable energy sources, followed by sorting in descending order and performing Pareto analysis to identify the top 80% user countries. Graphical analyses, including bar and pie charts, were employed alongside linear percentage calculations to determine frequency distribution. The findings reveal that 15 countries—China, the United States, Brazil, India, Germany, Japan, Canada, Spain, France, Italy, Türkiye, Russia, the United Kingdom, Australia, and Vietnam—account for over 80% (3,099,959 MW) of the world's total installed renewable energy capacity. China leads with 1,453,701.25 MW, followed by the USA with 387,548.59 MW, and Brazil with 194,084.66 MW. Solar energy is the largest contributor, representing 36.67% of global renewable capacity, followed by hydropower at 32.76% and wind energy at 26.29%. Bioenergy, geothermal, and marine energy contribute 3.88%, 0.38%, and 0.01%, respectively. The concentration of renewable energy capacity in a few countries and key sources underscores significant disparities in adoption and investment. The research emphasizes the need for tailored energy policies that consider regional resource availability, socio-economic structures, and geopolitical contexts to ensure equitable and sustainable energy development. Addressing these disparities is crucial for achieving the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), particularly SDG 7, which focuses on affordable and clean energy for all. This study provides valuable insights for policymakers, highlighting the importance of a diversified and balanced approach to renewable energy adoption to contribute to global carbon neutrality and environmental sustainability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.072
Threshold uncertainty score0.240

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.006
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0720.029

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.182
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations40
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSolar Energy and Sustainable DevelopmentSame topicEnergy and Environment ImpactsFrench-language works237,207