MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402082246 · doi:10.1016/j.iintel.2024.100121

Enhanced operational modal analysis and change point detection for vibration-based structural health monitoring of bridges

2024· article· en· W4402082246 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Serge Desjardins, David T. Lau

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Infrastructure Intelligence and Resilience · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Health Monitoring Techniques
Canadian institutionsCarleton UniversityUniversité de Moncton
FundersNew Brunswick Innovation Foundation
KeywordsStructural health monitoringOperational Modal AnalysisChange detectionModalModal analysisVibrationStructural engineeringAcousticsComputer scienceEnvironmental scienceEngineeringMaterials sciencePhysicsArtificial intelligenceComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

One of the most promising uses of vibration-based structural health monitoring (VBSHM) in bridge damage detection is the tracking of modes through long-term repeated or continuous operational modal analysis (OMA). Any shifts in modal parameters over time can signal structural damage. However, in real-world applications, noise and environmental uncertainties introduce variability in the data, potentially obscuring damage-related changes. To address this, it is essential to establish and understand the temporal trends and behavior of the estimated modal parameters, enabling accurate interpretation of the engineering data. This paper presents a detailed study focusing on data-driven techniques to improve the OMA results by determining the causes of modal variability and establishing modal models to filter out these known causes of variability. It explores the use of data continuously collected over a period of one month in November 2017 on the Confederation Bridge in eastern Canada. Operational modal analysis is conducted to extract modal frequencies and mode shapes, revealing correlations with environmental and operational factors such as wind, temperature and vehicular traffic. A novel approach using the residuals from regression modal models for damage detection is proposed, utilizing a change point detection algorithm. Results indicate the potential to detect shifts in modal frequencies corresponding to damage scenarios, at lower levels than was previously possible, highlighting the feasibility of using enhanced modal features for sensitive damage identification. Overall, the paper contributes to advancing the understanding of variability in vibration-based structural health monitoring and presents a promising practical technique for improving damage detection results using enhanced operational modal estimates in realistic field applications of a real-world structure. • The AI-FSI technique is used to extract the modal parameters of the Confederation Bridge. • Machine learning (smoothing and regression) is carried out on modal frequency time series. • Correlations with environmental and operational processes are identified and quantified. • A novel residual analysis with change point detection algorithm is presented. • The use of modal features for the identification of low-level damage is now possible.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2024
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Infrastructure Intelligence and ResilienceSame topicStructural Health Monitoring TechniquesFrench-language works237,207