Non-Newtonian behaviour of suspensions and emulsions: Review of different mechanisms
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The mechanisms of non-Newtonian behaviour of suspensions and emulsions in steady shear flow are reviewed. The review is divided into two parts. In the first part, the mechanisms of non-Newtonian behaviour in suspensions and emulsions composed of Newtonian matrix are reviewed. Both dilute and concentrated systems are discussed. In the second part, the mechanisms of non-Newtonian behaviour in suspensions and emulsions composed of non-Newtonian matrix are reviewed . Where appropriate, mathematical models describing the rheology are included. • The mechanisms for non-Newtonian behaviour in suspensions and emulsions are reviewed. • Dilute, concentrated, and highly concentrated systems are considered. • Suspensions and emulsions with Newtonian and non-Newtonian matrices are reviewed. • Shear-thinning, shear-thickening, and yield stress in suspensions and emulsions are discussed and explained.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it