MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402088908 · doi:10.18331/brj2024.11.3.2

Cascading valorization of defatted rice bran for lactic acid fermentation and biogas production

2024· article· en· W4402088908 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Christiane Herrmann, Raj Shekhar Bose, Anna‐Katrin Neu, Roland Schneider, Maria Alexandri

Bibliographic record

VenueBiofuel Research Journal · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBiofuel production and bioconversion
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersLeibniz-GemeinschaftBundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
KeywordsBranFermentationBiogasLactic acidFood scienceBiogas productionChemistryProduction (economics)BiotechnologyPulp and paper industryBiologyWaste managementRaw materialBacteriaOrganic chemistryAnaerobic digestionEngineeringMethaneEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study investigated the integrated valorization of defatted rice bran (DRB) by converting it into lactic acid (LA) and subsequently utilizing the residues from LA production for biomethane generation through anaerobic digestion (AD). Processing 480 kg of DRB resulted in the production of 70 L of pure LA and generated significant waste streams, primarily consisting of 572 kg of decanted hydrolysate pellet (Pellet DEC) and 220 kg of microfiltration retentate (Retentate MF). Exceptionally high methane yields of 374‒434 LN kgVS-1 were observed for residues from LA fermentation in biochemical methane potential tests, indicating their high potential for biogas production. During long-term semi-continuous AD, varying organic loading rates (OLRs) from 0.5‒2.5 kgVS m-3 d⁻¹ demonstrated feedstock- and OLR-dependent methane production. Reactor failure at higher OLRs was attributed to the accumulation of total ammoniacal nitrogen (TAN). The co-digestion of Pellet DEC and Retentate MF proved to be more resilient, with OLRs up to 2 kgVS m-3 d-1, mitigating TAN inhibition. Methane yields, ranging from 265‒334 LN kgVS-1 before reaching inhibitory OLR levels, were higher than those found in the literature. Process integration has emerged as a promising approach because the biogas generated from residues could effectively offset the energy demands of LA production. Supported by life cycle assessment, the integrated processes showed a 67% lower environmental impact at the midpoint and a 71% lower environmental impact at the endpoint, along with an 80% reduction in energy costs compared to the standalone LA production. Results proved a significant enhancement of the sustainability and economic viability of this integrated biorefinery approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.298

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiofuel Research JournalSame topicBiofuel production and bioconversionFrench-language works237,207