MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402093346 · doi:10.34172/ijhpm.8074

Fostering Experiential Learning and Evidence-Informed Impact in Health Systems: Reflections From a Canadian Health System Impact Fellow

2024· article· en· W4402093346 on OpenAlexaffabout
Jawad Chishtie, Peter Kellett, Meaghan Sim, Shawna Cronin, Christopher Collins, B. Catharine Craven, Sara J. T. Guilcher, Susan Jaglal

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Health Policy and Management · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicPrimary Care and Health Outcomes
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech UniversityNova Scotia Health AuthorityUniversity of LethbridgeToronto Rehabilitation InstituteUniversity Health NetworkUniversity of TorontoAlberta Health Services
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExperiential learningHealthcare systemPsychologyExperiential knowledgeMedical educationPublic relationsMedicinePolitical scienceHealth carePedagogyEpistemologyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fostering Experiential Learning and Evidence-Informed Impact in Health Systems: Reflections From a Canadian Health System Impact Fellow

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.060
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.052
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.882
Threshold uncertainty score0.853

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0600.052
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0360.029
Scholarly communication0.0180.008
Open science0.0070.019
Research integrity0.0120.034
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.139
GPT teacher head0.561
Teacher spread0.422 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Health Policy and ManagementSame topicPrimary Care and Health OutcomesFrench-language works237,207