EXPLORING THE CONNECTION: ALEXITHYMIA DAN KECANDUAN MEDIA SOSIAL PADA MAHASISWA
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengeksplorasi keterkaitan antara tingkat alexithymia dan tingkat ketergantungan pada media sosial di kalangan mahasiswa Program Studi Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam di UIN Raden Mas Said Surakarta. Pendekatan kuantitatif korelasional digunakan, dengan penerapan uji Spearman Rank sebagai metode analisis data. Teknik purposive sampling diterapkan untuk pemilihan sampel, dan sebanyak 155 partisipan terlibat dalam penelitian ini. Pengukuran menggunakan Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20) sebagai instrumen utama, dan skala kecanduan media sosial yang dikembangkan oleh Al-Menayes. Hasil analisis data dengan uji korelasi Spearman Rank menunjukkan nilai signifikansi p = 0,000 (p < 0,05). Temuan ini mengindikasikan diterimanya hipotesis penelitian, khususnya menegaskan adanya hubungan signifikan antara tingkat alexithymia dan tingkat ketergantungan pada media sosial pada mahasiswa Program Studi Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam di UIN Raden Mas Said Surakarta.TRANSLATE with x EnglishArabicHebrewPolishBulgarianHindiPortugueseCatalanHmong DawRomanianChinese SimplifiedHungarianRussianChinese TraditionalIndonesianSlovakCzechItalianSlovenianDanishJapaneseSpanishDutchKlingonSwedishEnglishKoreanThaiEstonianLatvianTurkishFinnishLithuanianUkrainianFrenchMalayUrduGermanMalteseVietnameseGreekNorwegianWelshHaitian CreolePersian // TRANSLATE with COPY THE URL BELOW Back EMBED THE SNIPPET BELOW IN YOUR SITE Enable collaborative features and customize widget: Bing Webmaster PortalBack//
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".