ITSBAT NIKAH DALAM RANGKA MEMBERIKAN PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP PERNIKAHAN SIRI
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nikah siri dilihat dari hukum positif Indonesia tidak diakui secara sah karena pernikahan siri adalah pernikahan yang tidak terdaftar secara resmi di Kantor Urusa Agama (KUA) atau Pencatatan Sipil. Dalam hukum Islam pernikahan siri sah, nikah yang syarat dan rukun nikahnya telah terpenuhi yaitu,wali nikah, dua orang saksi yang adil, ijab dan kabul. Hukum adat jika proses adatnya telah dilaksanakan yang diketahui oleh ketua adat perkawinan sah tanpa dilakukan dihadapan pegawai pencatat nikah.Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui bagaimana negara melindungi perempuan dan anak dalam pernikahan siri dan bagaimana prosedur pengajuan itsbat terhadap pernikahan siri. Penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif. Untuk mendapatkan perlindungan hukum bagi istri nikah siri dapat diterapkan dengan melakukan permohonan itsbat nikah ke Pengadilan Agama/Mahkamah Syar’iyah. Pernikahan siri karena berada dalam status perkawinan poligami tanpa izin istri sah, tidak dapat mengajukan itsbat nikah, kecuali mengajukan istbat nikah karena dalam rangka penyelesaian perceraian. Selain itu, pengajuan itsbat nikah juga tidak dapat dilakukan apabila salah satu pihak bukan beragama Islam.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.048 | 0.015 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".