MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Exploring Mobile Banking App Security from User’s Perspectives

2023· article· en· W4402094608 on OpenAlex
Olumide Bashiru Abiola

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal for Information Security Research · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicTechnology Adoption and User Behaviour
Canadian institutionsDe Beers (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMobile bankingBusinessComputer scienceMobile appsComputer securityInternet privacyWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Organizationalsupport and improved performance have seen unprecedented enhancement due to the ability of internet technology that is constantly changing the ways and procedures for attaining organizational goals.However, given the volume of digital-related transactions today, especially with mobile internet banking systems, cybersecurity threats, and privacy concerns arising from Internet use by businesses, their employees, and external stakeholders have become prevalent.The detrimental effects resulting from cybersecurity threats have an adverse effect on the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of information for banks and users of their mobile banking app services.The users' knowledge of cybersecurity vulnerability hampers their decision-making about adopting mobile banking.This study examines factors that affect cybersecurity and how mobile banking app users perceive cybersecurity issues that may hinder the banks' ability to expand mobile banking usage amongst their customers.Additionally, this study suggests a conceptual research model that illustrates the relationships between the variables that affect cybersecurity.The study discovered that users view knowledge of potential identity theft, impersonation, and account hijacking as cybersecurity threats that impede their use of mobile banking.The review of literature conducted identified that mobile banking app users who regard these concerns to be real are hesitant to embrace mobile banking.Similarly, the knowledge about cybersecurity threats putting mobile banking app users in danger makes them reluctant to use the app for banking purposes.As a result, mobile banking serves as a reminder to strategically reinforce the security and privacy issues in relation to cybercrime in the banking industry.Practically, the survival of banking in the future will depend on the retention of its mobile banking app users.The study contributes to the theory of cybersecurity, particularly in using the Internet as a platform for mobile banking.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.326
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.006
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.419
GPT teacher head0.519
Teacher spread0.100 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it