Collaboration école-famille-communauté: Étude sur la perception des connaissances et le sentiment de compétence des étudiants inscrits en formation initiale en enseignement
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article discusses pre-service teachers' perceptions of their knowledge level and their self-efficacy regarding family-school-community collaboration. The study included a sample of 222 students (preschool and elementary: 105; special education: 47; high school : 77) enlisted in the fourth year of the Bachelor degree in Education at l'Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières . Data indicates that a significant number of students reported a lack of knowledge and low self-efficacy regarding parent teacher conferences, workshops for parents, effective strategies for increased parental involvement, impact of family demographic characteristics on parental involvement, and understanding the community's role in promoting and sustaining the school mission. The lack of preparation was more salient with high school pre-service teachers than the other participants. Topics to be included in a structured teacher training program on family-school-community collaboration are suggested.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".