Inhabiting a Welcoming New Landscape: A First Year Teacher's Voyage of Discovery
Bibliographic record
Abstract
How does one successfully launch a teaching career? In what ways do teacher preparation programs, schools, and school districts support an individual's transition into the challenging world of teaching? These questions are addressed through the narrative of one new teacher's successful transition from the University of Calgary's BEd Master of Teaching Program into the teaching profession. The first year teacher, a district administrator, and a teacher preparation educator describe the structures, programs, and forms of learning that have enabled the teacher to "live well" as a novice educator. This successful induction into teaching began in a district with a self-described "mentoring culture." Recruitment, orientation, coaching, and evaluation processes are deliberately fashioned to provide a framework of supportive and learner-focused relationships. With these structures as launching points, the teacher's journey unfolds. Her explorations, discoveries, challenges. and questions encourage inquiry into best practices and foster the evolution as an innovative educator.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.030 | 0.018 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.016 | 0.010 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.013 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.015 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".