MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402109688 · doi:10.55016/ojs/jet.v44i2.52249

Rendering Unto Caesar: Reconciling Liberal Principles With the Requirements of Roman Catholic School Board "Expectations for Graduates"

2018· article· en· W4402109688 on OpenAlexaffabout
James C. Lang

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of educational thought. · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicCatholicism and Religious Studies
Canadian institutionsInstitute for Christian StudiesUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRendering (computer graphics)Mathematics educationPolitical scienceSociologyPsychologyComputer scienceComputer graphics (images)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

I discuss potential ethical issues for an educator required by a publicly-funded Ontario (or similar) Roman Catholic School Board employer to teach students such that when they graduate they will be "discerning believer[s] formed in the Catholic Faith community who celebrate[s] the signs and sacred mystery of God's presence through word, sacrament, prayer, forgiveness, reflection, and moral living" (I 998, p. 5). I contrast the moral responsibilities of a Catholic religious studies educator with the moral responsibilities of a public school educator who is guided by principles of liberalism as characterized, primarily, by some of the works of Will Kymlicka.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.808
Threshold uncertainty score0.504

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of educational thought.Same topicCatholicism and Religious StudiesFrench-language works237,207