MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402109698 · doi:10.55016/ojs/jet.v45i1.52232

Countering Disadvantage, Promoting Health The Value of Children Human Rights Education

2018· article· en· W4402109698 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of educational thought. · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation and Character Development
Canadian institutionsCape Breton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDisadvantageValue (mathematics)Human rightsPolitical scienceEnvironmental healthSocioeconomicsEconomic growthSociologyMedicineEconomicsLawMathematicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose of this article is to show the value of rights-respecting schools in countering the negative effects of social disadvantage and poverty on the education and health of children. The article builds on literature on the social determinants of health, showing a linkage between social position and health, and on education research, showing education to be a protective factor against disadvantage. In reference to a study of children's rights education in Hampshire, England, the authors adds to this literature by showing how schools with comprehensive children's human rights education - schools that model practices consistent with the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child - engage children in school and counter the ill effects of social disadvantage. In engaging children and providing them with a positive school climate, rights-respecting schools increase the likelihood that disadvantaged children will do better at school, complete school, and live healthier and more productive lives.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.642
Threshold uncertainty score0.753

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.393
Teacher spread0.374 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it