Optic Disc Infiltration as a Sign of Multiple Myeloma Recurrence
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Multiple myeloma is a plasma cell dyscrasia with an age-standardized incidence of 3 - 4 per 100,000 in the Caucasian population. It is the second most common hematological malignancy after non-Hodgkin lymphoma, representing 1% of all cancers. Herein, we present a case report of multiple myeloma with ocular involvement as a sign of recurrence. A 62-year-old woman, with a known history of lambda light chain multiple myeloma, presented with reduced visual acuity in both eyes while on maintenance chemotherapy. The patient also had mild unsteadiness and fatigue. Fundus examination revealed bilateral optic disc swelling and hemorrhages of the posterior pole. Magnetic resonance imaging disclosed no abnormalities. Although no biopsy of the optic nerve was possible, intracranial pressure was elevated and cerebrospinal fluid was riddled with neoplastic cells, affirming the diagnosis. After 2 months of chemotherapy, visual function and the appearance of the posterior pole returned to normal. In cases of multiple myeloma, mechanisms, such as hyperviscosity syndrome, microvascular impairment and optic nerve and meningeal infiltration on a cellular level may have played a pivotal role in the ocular involvement, which can be the first sign of recurrence.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".