MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402117773 · doi:10.5852/ejt.2024.950.2643

A revision of the simplex species group of the cleptoparasitic bee genus Triepeolus Robertson, 1901 (Hymenoptera: Apidae)

2024· article· en· W4402117773 on OpenAlexaff
Thomas M. Onuferko, Molly G. Rightmyer

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Taxonomy · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant and animal studies
Canadian institutionsCanadian Museum of NatureUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHymenopteraApidaeBiologyZoologyGenusHoney bee

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Species of the cleptoparasitic bee genus Triepeolus Robertson, 1901 (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Nomadinae) of which the female has a trapezoidal or triangular pseudopygidial area with bright, reflective setae and a concave apical margin are revised. This entirely New World group includes the widely known species T. simplex Robertson, 1903 and is thus termed the simplex species group. A total of 18 species in the T. simplex group are recognized as valid, of which seven are newly named and described—T. apache sp. nov., T. eumeniformis sp. nov., T. hirsutus sp. nov., T. oblongimacula sp. nov., T. parahirsutus sp. nov., T. paucipunctatus sp. nov., and T. shoshone sp. nov., all from North America. Eleven redundant names are newly synonymized under three valid ones as follows: Epeolus rugulosus Cockerell, 1917 syn. nov., E. metatarsalis Friese, 1921 syn. nov., and T. bilunatus Cockerell, 1949 syn. nov. under Triepeolus mexicanus (Cresson, 1878); E. lectiformis Cockerell, 1925 syn. nov., T. lusor Cockerell, 1925 syn. nov., and T. junctus Mitchell, 1962 syn. nov. under T. rhododontus Cockerell, 1921; and E. permixtus Cockerell, 1923 syn. nov., T. brunnescens Cockerell & Sandhouse, 1924 syn. nov., T. pacis Cockerell, 1925 syn. nov., E. sarothrinus Cockerell, 1929 syn. nov., and E. sarothrinus var. confluens Cockerell, 1929 syn. nov. under T. segregatus (Cockerell, 1900). Species limits were established using an integrative systematics approach, namely considering morphological and biogeographic evidence as well as DNA barcode data. Taxon concepts are revised for all species in the T. simplex group, with morphological diagnoses and keys presented to enable their identification. Known information on the ranges and ecology of the treated species is summarized.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.626
Threshold uncertainty score0.179

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.156 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of TaxonomySame topicPlant and animal studiesFrench-language works237,207