MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4402123992 · doi:10.1101/2024.09.01.610664

Two newly cultivated eukaryotrophic flagellates represent distinct anaerobic lineages within Rhizaria

2024· preprint· en· W4402123992 on OpenAlexaff
Yana Eglit, Maggie Lawton, Alastair G. B. Simpson, Ryan M.R. Gawryluk

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2024
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicProtist diversity and phylogeny
Canadian institutionsUniversity of VictoriaDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnaerobic exerciseBiologyEvolutionary biologyPhysiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Endomyxans are a poorly sampled and incompletely resolved aggregate of Rhizarian lineages that fall outside Filosa and Retaria. Among them, “Novel Clade 12” (NC12; Bass et al. 2009) is an environmental clade comprised primarily of sequences derived from anoxic sediments, hitherto lacking a morphologically-characterised representative. We have cultivated a marine anaerobic eukaryotroph, SSF, that we identify as the first representative of NC12. SSF is a teardrop-shaped cell with two unequal flagella emerging a third of the way down the cell behind a distinctive row of refractile globules. The posterior end of the cell is filled with food vacuoles. There is a surface thickening discernible in light microscopy. We also describe another distinct anaerobe eukaryotrophic lineage, also cultivated from marine sediment: PG. It consists of large pyriform cells with a substantial trailing “tail” and two unequal flagella, the posterior exceptionally long. In small subunit ribosomal RNA gene phylogenies, it falls outside the characterised clades and forms a distinct novel rhizarian lineage in its own right. Together, SSF and PG represent two additional independent adaptations to anoxic conditions within Rhizaria.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicProtist diversity and phylogeny→French-language works237,207→