Coarse-to-Fine Target Detection for HFSWR With Spatial-Frequency Analysis and Subnet Structure
Bibliographic record
Abstract
High-frequency surface wave radar (HFSWR) is a powerful tool for ship detection and surveillance. blackHowever, the use of pre-trained deep learning (DL) networks for ship detection is challenging due to the limited training samples in HFSWR and the substantial differences between remote sensing images and everyday images. To tackle these issues, this paper proposes a coarse-to-fine target detection approach that combines traditional methods with DL, resulting in improved performance. The contributions of this work include: 1) a two-stage learning pipeline that integrates spatial-frequency analysis (SFA) with subnet-based neural networks, 2) an automatic linear thresholding algorithm for plausible target region (PTR) detection, and 3) a robust subnet neural network for fine target detection. The advantage of using SFA and subnet network is that the SFA reduces the need for extensive training data, while the subnet neural network excels at localizing ships even with limited training data. Experimental results on the HFSWR-RD dataset affirm the model's superior performance compared to rival algorithms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".