MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402127474 · doi:10.3390/jcs8090342

Biodegradable Alternatives to Plastic in Medical Equipment: Current State, Challenges, and the Future

2024· article· en· W4402127474 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Composites Science · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMicroplastics and Plastic Pollution
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCurrent (fluid)Medical deviceState (computer science)Risk analysis (engineering)BusinessComputer scienceEngineeringBiomedical engineeringElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The use of plastic products or components in medical equipment and supplies results in challenges in terms of environmental sustainability and waste management for disposable, non-recyclable, and non-biodegradable materials. Medical plastic waste includes items ranging from syringes, tubing, intravenous (IV) bags, packaging, and more. Developing biodegradable replacements to petroleum-based plastics in medical equipment has not yet become an urgent priority, but it is an important endeavor. Examining alternatives involves several key themes, including material selection, testing, validation, and regulatory approval. To date, research includes studies on biodegradable polymers, composite materials, surface modifications, bacterial cellulose, three-dimensional (3D) printing with biodegradable materials, clinical trials and testing, collaboration with industry, regulatory considerations, sustainable packaging for medical devices, and life cycle analysis. The incorporation of bio-based and biodegradable plastics in the healthcare industry holds immense potential for reducing the environmental impact of medical plastic waste. The literature suggests that researchers and industry professionals are actively working towards finding sustainable alternatives that meet the stringent requirements of the medical industry. This paper reviews the efforts made so far to develop biodegradable and sustainable alternatives to plastic in medical equipment using a meta-analysis of resources, which include relevant papers published in English until June 2024. A total of 116 documents were found and screened by three reviewers for relevance. The literature reviewed indicated that various medical uses require plastics due to their unique properties, such as having strength and flexibility; being lightweight; and being able to prevent bacterial contamination. Among the alternatives, polycaprolactone (PCL), polylactic-co-glycolic acid (PLGA), starch-based acid, and polybutyric acid (PBS) have demonstrated favourable outcomes in terms of biocompatibility, safety, and efficacy. Additionally, a set of approaches to overcome these barriers and strategies is discussed alongside potential future solutions. This review aims to catalyze discussions and actions toward a more environmentally sustainable future in the medical industry by providing a comprehensive analysis of the current state, challenges, and prospects of this domain.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.900
Threshold uncertainty score0.208

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it