MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402131968 · doi:10.1016/j.cccb.2024.100292

Associations between MRI-visible perivascular spaces, brain atrophy, white matter hyperintensities, and speeded executive function, in neurodegenerative and cerebrovascular diseases.

2024· article· en· W4402131968 on OpenAlexaffabout
Daniela Andriuta, Joel Ramirez, Fuqiang Gao, Jennifer S. Rabin, Madeline E Wood, Paula McLaughlin, Christopher J.M. Scott, Miracle Ozzoude, Allison A. Dilliott, Robert A. Hegele, Maria Carmela Tartaglia, David F. Tang‐Wai, Richard H. Swartz, Leanne K. Casaubon, Sanjeev Kumar, Dar Dowlatshahi, Jennifer Mandzia, Demetrios J. Sahlas, Gustavo Saposnik, Corinne E. Fischer, Michael Borrie, Ayman Hassan, Malcolm A. Binns, Morris Freedman, Elizabeth Finger, Andrew Frank, Robert Bartha, Sean Symons, Mario Masellis, Sandra E. Black

Bibliographic record

VenueCerebral Circulation - Cognition and Behavior · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicCerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus
Canadian institutionsHealth Sciences CentreSunnybrook Health Science Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHyperintensityNeuropsychologyDementiaNeuroimagingAtrophyMedicineExecutive dysfunctionPsychologyWhite matterMagnetic resonance imagingPathologyCardiologyNeuroscienceCognitionInternal medicineDiseaseRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

MRI-visible perivascular spaces (PVS) are a neuroimaging feature of cerebral small vessel disease and are commonly observed in patients with cerebrovascular and neurodegenerative disease. However, it is unclear whether PVS burden is associated with cognition. The aim of this study was to investigate the potential associations between PVS volumes, brain atrophy, white matter hyperintensities (WMH), and speeded executive function, in patients from the Ontario Neurodegenerative Disease Research Initiative (ONDRI). ONDRI participants (n=333) clinically diagnosed with Alzheimer's disease/mild cognitive impairment (ADMCI), frontotemporal dementia (FTD), and cerebrovascular diseases (CVD), with clinical, neuropsychological, MRI, plasma biomarkers (glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP); neurofilament light, (NfL); p-tau181; Aβ42/40), and available apolipoprotein E epsilon 4 (APOE E4) status, were included in this analysis. MRI-based measurements for brain parenchymal fraction (BPF), lacunes, PVS and WMH were extracted using the ONDRI imaging pipeline. The neuropsychological test scores were standardized (z-transformed), speeded executive function z- scores were computed as the mean of digit symbol modalities test and trail making test part B timed z-scores. The variables selected in bivariate analysis (p<0.2) were introduced in a linear regression model with speeded executive function as the dependent variable, with and without BPF and WMH. To assess the effect of PVS volumes on processing speed through BPF and WMH volumes, a mediation analysis was applied. Speeded executive function was significantly associated with PVS (β=-0.115, p=0.04), GFAP (β standardized effect=-0.231, p=0.002), and the clinical diagnostic cohort (β=-0.160, p=0.004), the adjusted R2 of the model was 0.104 (p<0.001). However, it was not significantly associated with PVS (p=0.691) when BPF and WMH volumes were included in the model, suggesting the relationship was mediated by these factors. In the mediation analysis, the total model effect of PVS on speeded executive function was significant (effect=-0.1067, p=0.042), due to an indirect effect of PVS, mediated by BPF (effect=-0.0718) and WMH (effect=-0.0256). Our preliminary results suggest that the relationship between PVS volume and speeded executive function is mediated by global atrophy and WMH in neurodegenerative and cerebrovascular disease. Future analyses will further examine the role of plasma biomarkers and other imaging markers such as cerebral microbleeds.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score0.065

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCerebral Circulation - Cognition and BehaviorSame topicCerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalusFrench-language works237,207