Establishment and identification of the gill cell line from the blunt snout bream (Megalobrama amblycephala) and its application in studying gill remodeling under hypoxia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract To probe the mechanisms of gill remodeling in blunt snout bream under hypoxic conditions, we selected gill tissue for primary cell culture to establish and characterize the first blunt snout bream gill cell line, named MAG. The gill cells were efficiently passaged in M199 medium supplemented with 8% antibiotics and 15% fetal bovine serum at 28 °C, exhibiting primarily an epithelial-fibroblast mixed type. Additionally, the MAG cells (17th generation) were subjected to four experimental conditions—normoxia, hypoxia 12 h, hypoxia 24 h, and reoxygenation 24 h (R24h)—to evaluate the effects of hypoxia and reoxygenation on MAG cells during gill remodeling. We found that the MAG cell morphology underwent shrinkage and mitochondrial potential gradually lost, even leading to gradual apoptosis with increasing hypoxia duration and increased reactive oxygen species (ROS) activity. Upon reoxygenation, MAG cells gradually regain cellular homeostasis, accompanied by a decrease in ROS activity. Analysis of superoxide dismutase (SOD), glutathione (GSH), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), catalase (CAT), anti-superoxide anion, and other enzyme activities revealed enhanced antioxidant enzyme activity in MAG cells during hypoxia, aiding in adapting to hypoxic stress and preserving cell morphology. After reoxygenation, the cells gradually returned to normoxic levels. Our findings underscore the MAG cells can be used to study hypoxic cell apoptosis during gill remodeling. Therefore, the MAG cell line will serve as a vital in vitro model for exploring gill remodeling in blunt snout bream under hypoxia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".