Structure-Based Design and Development of Phosphine Oxides as a Novel Chemotype for Antibiotics that Dysregulate Bacterial ClpP Proteases
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A series of arylsulfones and heteroarylsulfones have previously been demonstrated to dysregulate the conserved bacterial ClpP protease, causing the unspecific degradation of essential cellular housekeeping proteins and ultimately resulting in cell death. A cocrystal structure of a 2-β-sulfonylamide analog, ACP1-06, with Escherichia coli ClpP showed that its 2-pyridyl sulfonyl substituent adopts two orientations in the binding site related through a sulfone bond rotation. From this, a new bis -aryl phosphine oxide scaffold, designated as ACP6, was designed based on a “conformation merging” approach of the dual orientation of the ACP1-06 sulfone. One analog, ACP6-12, exhibited over a 10-fold increase in activity over the parent ACP1-06 compound, and a cocrystal X-ray structure with ClpP confirmed its predicted binding conformation. This allowed for a comparative analysis of how different ligand classes bind to the hydrophobic binding site. The study highlights the successful application of structure-based rational design of novel phosphine oxide-based antibiotics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".