MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402146051 · doi:10.4028/p-dg7jhf

Modification of the Chitosan Spray Coating on Pineapple Pulp as Adsorbent for Copper Ion Adsorption from Aqueous Solution

2024· article· en· W4402146051 on OpenAlexaff
Panida Charnkeitkong, Woranart Jonglertjunya, Xian She Feng

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in science and technology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAdsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceAdsorptionChitosanCopperAqueous solutionChemical engineeringPulp (tooth)CoatingIonComposite materialMetallurgyOrganic chemistryChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

One of the major toxicants for living things is copper which consists of ions form in most of the manufacturing wastewater treatment. The drain water before releasing it into the water source is desired to eliminate copper ions (Cu 2+ ) by using adsorption. The bio-wastes as adsorbents applied in this work, such as a dried pineapple pulp (DPP), chitosan flake (CTS), and chitosan spray coating on dried pineapple pulp (CPP) have a surface area of about 45.34, 60.02, and 70.01 m 2 /g, respectively. The effective Cu 2+ eliminated efficiency and adsorption capacity from the copper (II) sulfate in aqueous solution was high with the high surface area. At optimum operating conditions, i.e., initial feed concentration 250 mg/L, pH 6.0, temperature 30 °C, and adsorption time 1 h, the Cu 2+ eliminated efficiency in the percentage of DPP, CTS, and, CCP was 63.89, 80.83 and 86.92%, respectively, and adsorption capacity was 31.95, 40.22 and 43.46 mg/g, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.118
Threshold uncertainty score0.367

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvances in science and technologySame topicAdsorption and biosorption for pollutant removalFrench-language works237,207