Energy Minimization in STAR-RIS Assisted UAV Enabled SWIPT Systems with FHB Protocol
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper investigates how to improve the energy efficiency of unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)-enabled simultane-ous wireless information and power transfer (SWIPT) systems with multiple outdoor energy receivers (ERs) and multiple indoor wired-charging information receivers (IRs) by utilizing simul-taneously transmitting and reflecting reconfigurable intelligence (STAR-RIS), in which the UAV avoids flying over the indoor no-fly zone. Specifically, the total UAV energy consumption is minimized, while ensuring that the energy harvesting require-ment (EHR) of each ER and the communication throughput requirement (CTR) of each IR are met. To achieve this, the total UAV energy consumption is minimized by optimizing the STAR-RIS phase-shifts, the UAV trajectory, and hovering time using an iterative technique based on the fly-hover-broadcast (FHB) protocol. The technique allows the UAV to radiate energy-carrying information signals for the ERs and IRs at a limited number of hover positions. Simulation results demonstrate that the proposed design significantly outperforms other benchmark schemes, demonstrating its potential for improving the energy efficiency of UAV-enabled SWIPT systems while meeting the EHRs of each ER and the CTR of each IR.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".