Federated Unlearning with Multiple Client Partitions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Federated learning (FL) has recently received more and more attention in the joint field of distributed machine learning (ML) and privacy computing. Similar to the traditional ML systems, there exists the need of effective and efficient unlearning algorithms to unlearn certain training data from the FL model. The traditional machine unlearning algorithms have limitations for the FL systems, since the data of clients are both private and non-IID. In this paper, we propose a new algorithm for federated unlearning called FedUMP to improve the model performance and accelerate the unlearning process. Its main idea is to first create multiple different client partition strategies, each of which divides the clients into several subsets. Then we independently train subset models for all client subsets and aggregate the results of subset models for predictions. Furthermore, we propose a retraining acceleration method to reduce the time consumption with multiple partitions, and a partition strategy design method to search for good partition strategies efficiently. Extensive experiments on various datasets and model architectures demonstrate that FedUMP improves both model performance and unlearning speed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".