Adaptive Bandwidth Allocation in Multiuser MIMO THz Systems with Graph-Transformer Networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Terahertz (THz) wireless systems aim to support content-rich applications with ultra-high data rate. Due to high molecular absorption, THz signals experience severe path loss. Adaptive sub-band bandwidth (ASB) allocation can mitigate absorption attenuation by allocating THz sub-bands with variable bandwidth to the users. However, in ASB allocation, since the bandwidth of sub-bands may not be known a priori, accurate channel estimation is challenging. To overcome this issue, in this paper, we propose a heterogeneous graph-transformer network (HGTN) to bypass the channel estimation phase. We formulate a sum-rate maximization problem with quality-of-service (QoS) constraints in a multiuser multiple-input multiple-output (MU-MIMO) THz system to optimize the precoding and ASB allocation. The proposed HGTN parameterizes the mapping from input features (e.g., location information, users' minimum data rate) to the optimized system parameters via unsupervised learning. The proposed HGTN can be applied to systems with different number of users once it is trained. Simulation results show that our proposed HGTN achieves a higher system sum-rate with faster convergence when compared with the unsupervised deep neural network learning algorithm.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".