MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402159510 · doi:10.1109/tdsc.2024.3446587

PulseAnomaly: Unsupervised Anomaly Detection on Avionic Platforms With Seasonality and Trend Modeling in Transformer Networks

2024· article· en· W4402159510 on OpenAlexafffund
Hanbo Yu, Steven H. H. Ding, Mohammad Zulkernine

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAnomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityQueen's University
FundersInnovation for Defence Excellence and Security
KeywordsAnomaly detectionAvionicsComputer scienceAnomaly (physics)TransformerData miningElectrical engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For communication within military avionic platforms (e.g., F-15 and F-35), the US Department of Defense established MIL-STD-1553 military standard. It has been released for more than 50 years and is still used in platforms other than military avionics. It was originally produced to be used with military avionics, but in the following decades, it was adopted into all branches of the armed forces, as well as spacecraft and commercial avionics. However, potential attacks against the MIL-STD-1553 may exist due to the demand for internet communication between planes and the lack of security. The current study presentsPulseAnomaly, a novel unsupervised anomaly detection model for the MIL-STD-1553 bus that utilizes time-feature and message sequences. Our model demonstrates better performance compared to baseline models in the test, achieving a higher F1-score and showing excellent AUROC compared to existing methods. Additionally, we have used data from a recently developed open-source MIL-STD-1553 real-time bus simulator, which features a more diverse range of attacks and data points that more closely resemble real-world scenarios. Evaluation results show that our model outperforms existing unsupervised solutions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure ComputingSame topicAnomaly Detection Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207