CV.eDNA: A hybrid approach to invertebrate biomonitoring using computer vision and DNA metabarcoding
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Automated invertebrate classification using computer vision has shown significant potential to improve specimen processing efficiency. However, challenges such as invertebrate diversity and morphological similarity among taxa can make it difficult to infer fine-scale taxonomic classifications using computer vision. As a result, many invertebrate computer vision models are forced to make classifications at coarser levels, such as at family or order. Here we propose a novel modular method to combine computer vision and bulk DNA metabarcoding specimen processing pipelines to improve the accuracy and taxonomic granularity of individual specimen classifications. To improve specimen classification accuracy, our methods use multimodal fusion models that combine image data with DNA-based assemblage data. To refine the taxonomic granularity of the model’s classifications, our methods cross-references the classifications with DNA metabarcoding detections from bulk samples. We demonstrated these methods using a continental-scale, invertebrate bycatch dataset collected by the National Ecological Observatory Network. We also introduce the CV.eDNA R package, which aims to assist practitioners looking to implement our methods. Using our methods, we reached a classification accuracy of 79.6% across the 17 taxa using real DNA assemblage data, and 83.6% when the assemblage data was “error-free”, resulting in a 2.2% and 6.2% increase in accuracy when compared to a model trained using only images. After cross-referencing with the DNA metabarcoding detections, we improved taxonomic granularity in up to 72.2% of classifications, with up to 5.7% reaching species-level. By providing computer vision models with coincident DNA assemblage data, and refining individual classifications using DNA metabarcoding detections, our methods the potential to greatly expand the capabilities of biological computer vision classifiers. Our methods allow computer vision classifiers to infer taxonomically fine-grained classifications when it would otherwise be difficult or impossible due to challenges of morphologic similarity or data scarcity. These methods are not limited to terrestrial invertebrates and could be applied in any instance where image and DNA metabarcoding data are concurrently collected.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".