Foundation model-driven distributed learning for enhanced retinal age prediction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The retinal age gap (RAG) is emerging as a potential biomarker for various diseases of the human body, yet its utility depends on machine learning models capable of accurately predicting biological retinal age from fundus images. However, training generalizable models is hindered by potential shortages of diverse training data. To overcome these obstacles, this work develops a novel and computationally efficient distributed learning framework for retinal age prediction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The proposed framework employs a memory-efficient 8-bit quantized version of RETFound, a cutting-edge foundation model for retinal image analysis, to extract features from fundus images. These features are then used to train an efficient linear regression head model for predicting retinal age. The framework explores federated learning (FL) as well as traveling model (TM) approaches for distributed training of the linear regression head. To evaluate this framework, we simulate a client network using fundus image data from the UK Biobank. Additionally, data from patients with type 1 diabetes from the UK Biobank and the Brazilian Multilabel Ophthalmological Dataset (BRSET) were utilized to explore the clinical utility of the developed methods. RESULTS: Our findings reveal that the developed distributed learning framework achieves retinal age prediction performance on par with centralized methods, with FL and TM providing similar performance (mean absolute error of 3.57 ± 0.18 years for centralized learning, 3.60 ± 0.16 years for TM, and 3.63 ± 0.19 years for FL). Notably, the TM was found to converge with fewer local updates than FL. Moreover, patients with type 1 diabetes exhibited significantly higher RAG values than healthy controls in all models, for both the UK Biobank and BRSET datasets (P < .001). DISCUSSION: The high computational and memory efficiency of the developed distributed learning framework makes it well suited for resource-constrained environments. CONCLUSION: The capacity of this framework to integrate data from underrepresented populations for training of retinal age prediction models could significantly enhance the accessibility of the RAG as an important disease biomarker.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".