MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402166203 · doi:10.1061/geosek.0000560

Tackling Climate Change

2024· article· en· W4402166203 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jyoti K. Chetri, Sylvia Pimentel, Valeria Kandou, Jimmy D’Angelo, Krishna R. Reddy

Bibliographic record

VenueGEOSTRATA Magazine · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicCOVID-19 impact on air quality
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClimate changeEnvironmental scienceGeologyOceanography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

By now, the term “climate change” is familiar to most of us. Despite its somewhat abstract nature, there's mounting evidence of its real-world impact on our planet. Take, for example, the devastating wildfire in Lytton, B.C., Canada, in 2021. The village recorded unprecedented high temperatures for three consecutive days in June 2021, leading to a fierce wildfire that impacted thousands of lives and properties. This is just one of many incidents that showcase the reality of climate change and its consequences. Nations worldwide have recognized the urgency of addressing climate change. A landmark initiative in this direction is the Paris Agreement, which was endorsed in 2015 by 196 countries. This agreement aims to curb global warming by keeping the rise in global temperatures well below 2°C.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.617
Threshold uncertainty score0.991

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.024

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGEOSTRATA MagazineSame topicCOVID-19 impact on air qualityFrench-language works237,207