Bibliographic record
Abstract
In describing our ideals of dignity and the like as fictions, I reflect on and uphold a non-pejorative understanding of fiction and how that stance is abused by power, which is unable to recognize any interiority except its own. To allow for that narrative of inner life, I accept the negative charge of the dialectic I am already thrown into; only then can I author my particularity/interiority and respond to the master enframing scheme which conceals our inner lives. All this movement and recognition of disquiet requires a certain quiet, a nothingness as fictitious and factful as the ideals that will spring forth from it. Not without that reflection can I step into my own being, to take account of where I might be wrong, to truly inhabit and entertain that which fascinates me, and to maintain a metaphysics wherein I am not only other but also open to the call of another. This is a reorientating quiet, an invitation to a creative nihil.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.026 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.014 | 0.049 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.017 | 0.016 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.020 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.013 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".