MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4402186917 · doi:10.32920/26866495.v1

Impact of the Discrete, Stochastic Nature of Cell-Virus Interactions on the Likelihood of Infection Establishment, Interpretations of Experimental Infectivity Measurements, and Parameter Estimation From Such Measurements

2024· preprint· en· W4402186917 on OpenAlexaff
Christian Quirouette

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalToronto Metropolitan UniversityUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInfectivityEstimationEstimation theoryStatistical physicsMaximum likelihoodEconometricsBiological systemMathematicsStatisticsBiologyVirusVirologyApplied mathematicsPhysicsEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A virus infection can be initiated with very few infectious virions, and as such can become extinct, i.e. stochastically fail to take hold. There are many ways that a fully competent infectious virion, having successfully entered a cell, can fail to cause a productive infection, i.e. one that yields infectious virus progeny. Though many discrete, stochastic mathematical models (DSMs) have been developed and used to estimate an infection's extinction probability, these typically neglect infection failure post viral entry. The DSM presented herein introduces parameter γ ∈(0,1] which corresponds to the probability that a virion's entry into a cell will result in a productive cell infection. We derive an expression for the likelihood of extinction in this DSM, and find that prophylactic therapy with an antiviral acting to reduce γ is best at increasing the extinction probability. Using the DSM, we investigate the difference in the fraction of cells consumed by so-called extinct versus established infections. We show how the number of virus released, not the timing of the release, as previously claimed, affects infection extinction. Using a continuous deterministic mathematical model to represent a virus infection, an inherently stochastic process, could lead to inaccurate estimation of infection parameters. Further, to measure infectivity, methods rely on counting the number of infections a sample can cause. Infections in infectivity assays could become extinct and affect the measurements thereof. This raises the question as to whether parameter estimates are different when taking into account the stochastic nature of infection in infection experiments or in their measurements. Herein, we perform parameter estimation, with a DSM and its mean-field counterpart. Notably, for the DSM, a different pair of parameters are degenerate but biologically reasonable rather than arbitrary bounds can be imposed on the degenerate parameters. We find that the stochastic variability is negligible in the actual viral time course of infection experiments but considerable for the measured viral time course. These findings suggest that stochasticity may not play an important role in infection experiments only in their measurements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.014
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.061
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.074

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0140.061
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.359
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models→French-language works237,207→