MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402187332 · doi:10.1109/tvt.2024.3453333

Multi-UAV Assisted Mixed FSO/RF Communication Network for Urgent Tasks: Fairness Oriented Design With DRL

2024· article· en· W4402187332 on OpenAlexaff
Fang Xu, Bin Duo, Yiyuan Xie, Gaofeng Pan, Yandong Yang, Luozhi Zhang, Yichen Ye, Tingnan Bao, T. Aaron Gulliver, Yuanchen Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptical Wireless Communication Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of VictoriaUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNatural Science Foundation of ChongqingChina Postdoctoral Science FoundationNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsComputer scienceRadio frequencyComputer networkElectronic engineeringEngineeringTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Wireless communications can be improved by employing free space optical (FSO) channels. Since optical signals can only be transmitted via line-of-sight paths, UAVs are employed to forward data from a base station (BS) to remote users for urgent tasks using multi-hop mixed FSO/RF links. The UAVs employ the decode and forward protocol to relay data. The last UAV decodes and forwards the data to multiple users through RF links using non-orthogonal multiple access (NOMA). To improve fairness, a modified deep reinforcement learning (DRL) algorithm is used to optimize the transmit power allocation in real-time to minimize the maximum user decoding outage probability. Numerical results are presented to illustrate the system design tradeoffs. In addition, the validity of the proposed approach are verified by comparing it with exhaustive search algorithm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Vehicular TechnologySame topicOptical Wireless Communication TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207