MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402187332 · doi:10.1109/tvt.2024.3453333

Multi-UAV Assisted Mixed FSO/RF Communication Network for Urgent Tasks: Fairness Oriented Design With DRL

2024· article· en· W4402187332 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptical Wireless Communication Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of VictoriaUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNatural Science Foundation of ChongqingChina Postdoctoral Science FoundationNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsComputer scienceRadio frequencyComputer networkElectronic engineeringEngineeringTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Wireless communications can be improved by employing free space optical (FSO) channels. Since optical signals can only be transmitted via line-of-sight paths, UAVs are employed to forward data from a base station (BS) to remote users for urgent tasks using multi-hop mixed FSO/RF links. The UAVs employ the decode and forward protocol to relay data. The last UAV decodes and forwards the data to multiple users through RF links using non-orthogonal multiple access (NOMA). To improve fairness, a modified deep reinforcement learning (DRL) algorithm is used to optimize the transmit power allocation in real-time to minimize the maximum user decoding outage probability. Numerical results are presented to illustrate the system design tradeoffs. In addition, the validity of the proposed approach are verified by comparing it with exhaustive search algorithm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.793
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it