MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402189165 · doi:10.32920/26862385

Designing for Stages of Vacancy in Toronto's New Suburban Elementary Schools

2024· preprint· en· W4402189165 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Meredith Davis

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducational Environments and Student Outcomes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematics educationVacancy defectSociologyGeographyPsychologyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<p>Elementary school buildings are located throughout every neighbourhood in Toronto and hold social, environmental, and economic value. However, due to shifting contextual demands, these buildings often experience varying degrees of vacancy, including underuse during non-school hours, enrolment decline, and eventual school closure. This thesis explores how common scenarios of school vacancy can be planned for in the initial design stages using adaptable design approaches. Case studies are analyzed through the lens of relevant adaptability theories as a form of design research. The findings are then used to critique a recently constructed school in Toronto's inner suburbs. In response to the existing school on the site, an adaptable design proposal is developed, showcasing how a school's occupancy can evolve over its life cycle and extend the useful life of the building.</p>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.358
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.395
Teacher spread0.351 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEducational Environments and Student OutcomesFrench-language works237,207