MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402189204 · doi:10.32920/26883781.v1

Stochastic-Based Hyperparameter Selection and Learnability Analysis in Supervised and Unsupervised Learning

2024· preprint· en· W4402189204 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMachine Learning and Data Classification
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLearnabilityHyperparameterMachine learningArtificial intelligenceUnsupervised learningComputer scienceSelection (genetic algorithm)Supervised learningNatural language processingArtificial neural network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<p>The goal of a learning algorithm is to receive a training data set as input and provide a hypothesis that can generalize to all possible data points from a domain set. The hypothesis is chosen from hypothesis classes with potentially different complexity orders that represent controlling parameters in the learning process, also denoted as hyperparameters. Linear regression modeling is an important category of learning algorithms. Uncertainty of target samples in practical applications affects the generalization performance of the learned model. Failing to choose a proper model or hypothesis class can lead to serious issues such as underfitting or overfitting. These issues have been addressed by alternating cost functions or by utilizing cross-validation methods. These approaches can introduce new hyperparameters with their own new challenges and uncertainties or increase the computational complexity of the learning algorithm. On the other hand, the theory of probably approximately correct (PAC) aims at defining learnability based on probabilistic settings. Despite its theoretical value, PAC does not address practical learning issues on many occasions. This thesis is inspired by the foundation of PAC and is motivated by existing regression learning issues. The proposed approach, denoted by ε-Confidence Approximately Correct (ε-CoAC), utilizes Kullback—Leibler divergence (relative entropy) and proposes a new related typical set in the set of hyperparameters to tackle the learnability issue. ε-CoAC learnability is able to validate the learning process as a function of data length and as a function of the complexity order of the hypothesis class. Moreover, it enables the learner to compare hypothesis classes of different complexity order (hyperparameters) and choose among them the optimum with the minimum ε in the ε-CoAC framework. The ε-CoAC learnability not only overcomes the issues of overfitting and underfitting, but also shows advantages and superiority over the well-known cross-validation method in terms of time consumption and in terms of accuracy. A valuable application of ε-CoAC learnability is presented for simultaneous model order and time delay selection for LTI systems. Classical methods have approached this problem from two separate angles for time-delay estimation and for order selection with different cost functions. The ε-CoAC approach solves the problem with a unified cost function. The proposed method not only outperforms existing approaches but is also shown to be more robust to variations of the signal to noise ratio (SNR). The approach is also extended for online impulse response estimation and introduces efficient stopping criteria that are extremely valuable in practical applications. For the second hyperparameter analysis in machine learning, the challenge of regularization hyperparameter selection for the Support Vector Machine (SVM) algorithm is addressed. The regularization parameter controls the model capacity and the trade-off between the training and the generalization errors. It is shown that interestingly the introduced Separability and Scatteredness (S&S) ratio plays a key role in SVM hyperparameter selection, including kernel hyperparameters. Importance of S&S ratio in this context is similar to the role of the signal-to-noise ratio in the signal processing context. The proposed method outperforms existing cross-validation approaches, especially in the sense of computational complexity. For the hyperparameter selection in unsupervised learning, the fundamentals of ε-CoAC learnability is utilized by viewing the problem of clustering from a new angle. The application of the proposed stochastic based hyperparameter selecting algorithm can be generalized in the form of a validity index. The new validity index is shown to be superior to the state-of-the-art validity indices in the sense of accuracy and robustness to the cluster shape. Finally, the proposed validation index approach is extended for application in graph node clustering. The approach shows advantages over the existing methods in the sense of conductance and graph-based normalizing cuts.</p>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.439
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMachine Learning and Data ClassificationFrench-language works237,207