MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402192683 · doi:10.1111/pde.15729

Multiple café‐au‐lait macules, axillary freckling, and hypopigmented macules in a child

2024· article· en· W4402192683 on OpenAlexaff
Kristie Mar, Alison M. R. Castle, Joseph M. Lam

Bibliographic record

VenuePediatric Dermatology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicDermatological and Skeletal Disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDermatologyBirthmark

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An 8-year-old male presented with hyperpigmented macules and patches over the body present since birth. He was otherwise healthy with normal development. Evaluation revealed six café-au-lait macules (CALMs) larger than 5 mm in diameter (Figure 1), bilateral axillary freckling (Figure 2), and multiple hypopigmented macules over his back (Figure 3). He lacked cutaneous neurofibromas or pilomatricomas. Pediatric ophthalmologic exam was normal with no evidence of optic gliomas or Lisch nodules. The patient's sister also had multiple CALMs and a history of T-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma. His two other siblings were asymptomatic, and the parents were first cousins. Prior genetic testing did not identify any pathogenic variants in neurofibromin 1 (NF1) or Sprouty Related EVH1 Domain Containing 1 (SPRED1). While the patient met the clinical diagnostic criteria for neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1),1 the combination of a sibling with features of NF1 and cancer; negative NF1 genetic testing; and a history of consanguinity was highly suggestive of constitutional mismatch repair deficiency (CMMRD). The family was referred to Medical Genetics for further assessment. Given the suspicion for CMMRD, mismatch repair immunohistochemistry was performed on his sister's tumor, which demonstrated loss of PMS1 homolog 2, mismatch repair system component (PMS2) expression in the tumor, and a germline multi-gene panel for CMMRD identified a homozygous pathogenic variant in PMS2 (c.1624delA), confirming the diagnosis of CMMRD in his sister. Our patient was tested and confirmed to share the same homozygous pathogenic PMS2 variant. CMMRD is a rare autosomal recessive syndrome linked to an increased cancer risk and results from biallelic pathogenic variants in one of four mismatch repair (MMR) genes: MutL protein Homolog 1 (MLH1), MutS Homolog 2 (MSH2), MutS Homolog 6 (MSH6), and PMS2.2-4 Affected individuals develop tumors early in life, including T-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma, high-grade gliomas, colorectal cancers, and adenomas.2, 4 Approximately 80% of patients experience their first malignancy before age 18.2 Nearly all patients eventually develop a malignancy, and some experience multiple primary cancers.2, 4 Patients may exhibit a phenotype akin to NF1 which can delay diagnosis and management.2 The majority of patients with CMMRD will have café-au-lait macules, with many meeting clinical diagnostic criteria for NF1. Rarely, patients with CMMRD can also develop additional features of NF1 such as subcutaneous nodules, iris nodules, skeletal abnormalities, or optic pathway tumors, but interestingly these NF1-like findings are only seen in CMMRD patients with CALMs.2 Multiple CALMs may be the initial presenting feature, appearing within the first year of life, followed by skinfold freckling during school years.2 After puberty or in early adulthood, additional NF1-like manifestations may arise.2 Some patients do not develop café-au-lait macules but may have other cutaneous findings such as nevus depigmentosus or pilomatricomas.2, 5 When a child presents with café-au-lait macules and other signs indicative of NF1, especially when there is a sibling but no parent with of NF1 features, malignancy in a sibling, and parental consanguinity, CMMRD should be strongly considered in the differential diagnosis.2, 5 The prevalence of CMMRD is presently unknown, but it is estimated to be around one in one million unrelated parents.2 Approximately, 40%–45% of affected families are consanguineous.2 An estimated 1 in 258 (0.4%) children suspected of having NF1 with negative NF1/SPRED1 testing have CMMRD.2 Diagnosing CMMRD can be complex, but generally involves genetic investigations and ancillary testing, such as immunohistochemistry for the four MMR proteins.6, 7 Early diagnosis of CMMRD in children can help initiate cancer surveillance, though determining individual cancer risks remains challenging.2 A diagnosis of CMMRD in a child implies both parents carry a single pathogenic MMR gene, typically establishing a diagnosis of Lynch syndrome in the parents with implications for their medical management.2 An inherited pathogenic variant in a single allele of one of the four MMR genes can cause Lynch syndrome, an autosomal dominant disorder. Individuals with deleterious germline mutations in both alleles of the MMR genes develop the autosomal recessive disorder, CMMRD.8 Parents can receive counseling on family planning, as there is a 25% chance of other children having CMMRD, and a 50% chance that other children will have Lynch syndrome.2 The risk of diagnosing Lynch syndrome in minors must be balanced with potential benefits of early diagnosis of CMMRD.2 Once the diagnosis is established, patients should be monitored with clinical examination and brain MRI scans every 6 months, along with annual whole-body MRI scans starting at age six.2, 6 Tumor surveillance of the entire gastrointestinal tract involves annual screening with ileocolonoscopy, video capsule endoscopy, and/or colonoscopy, commencing between ages four to six, unless polyps are detected earlier.2, 6 Monitoring for leukemia/lymphoma involves biannual complete blood counts from the time of diagnosis, supplemented by abdominal ultrasound every 6 months starting at 1 year of age for lymphadenopathy and/or organ involvement.6 Gynecological exam, transvaginal ultrasound, urine cytology, and dipstick are recommended annually starting from the age of 20 years.2, 6 This case highlights the importance of a careful family history and awareness of the differential diagnosis of NF1, specifically the importance of asking about consanguinity and malignancy history. Such an approach could facilitate the early identification of CMMRD before the onset of cancer.2, 4 The dermatologist may play a crucial role in facilitating early diagnosis, significantly improving the prognosis.4 Authors made significant contribution to study conception and design, data collection, analysis and interpretation of results, and draft manuscript preparation. All authors read and approved the final version. This article has no funding source. The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.609
Threshold uncertainty score0.909

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePediatric DermatologySame topicDermatological and Skeletal DisordersFrench-language works237,207