MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402197707 · doi:10.25071/2563-3694.144

Dawn

2024· article· en· W4402197707 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Erik Brownrigg

Bibliographic record

VenueNew Sociology Journal of Critical Praxis · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicNietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This poem captures the utopian state of dawn, and the potential of becoming, imagination, and possibility therein. As Nietzsche (2003) argues in his chapter “Before Sunrise” in Thus Spoke Zarathustra, the moment before sunrise suggests an amplifying utopian and poetic relation of the poet with the world as dialogue, one that exists in between the earth and sky; day and night (also see Bachelard, 1988). This moment of flux, as highlighted in the action of the sky, namely the sky’s paling, exemplifies the oscillation between macrocosm and microcosm, mirroring the ebb and flow of the utopian spirit. Every morning is possibility itself; the becoming of heights. The rising blue sky is the friend that keeps you company as you climb the mountains of your life. The following piece inhabits and animates this liminal space, operating as a literary image and state of becoming for both the influx self and the rising sun in its state of betweenness.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.801
Threshold uncertainty score0.989

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNew Sociology Journal of Critical PraxisSame topicNietzsche, Schopenhauer, and HegelFrench-language works237,207