KAJIAN KONSEP ARSITEKTUR BIOFILIK PADA BANGUNAN SOUTH QUARTER JAKARTA SELATAN
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRAK. Mixed Use Building dengan pendekatan Biofilik merupakan bangunan serbaguna yang mencakup fungsi beragam, termasuk area komersil, hunian, dan pedestarian. Permasalahan serius seperti polusi dan penggunaan energi yang tinggi di Jakarta berdampak signifikan pada kesehatan penghuni. Dengan menerapkan prinsip Biofilik, bangunan menambahkan unsur alam seperti tanaman, menciptakan Kesehatan, produktivitas dan investasi ekonomi untuk kesejateraan pengguna. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui karakteristik konsep biofilik pada bangunan South Quarter Jakarta Selatan. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode deskriptif kualitatif. Penelitian menunjukan desain bangunan South Quarter berhasil mengintegrasikan tumbuhan alam dan elemen alam dalam desainnya, menciptakan rangsangan langsung dengan alam, serta meningkatkan kenyamanan pengguna melalui desain yang merespon iklim sekitar. Kata Kunci: Arsitektur, Biofilik, Mixed Use ABSTRACT. The Mixed Use Building with a Biofilic approach is a versatile structure that encompasses various functions, including commercial areas, residences, and pedestrian spaces. Serious issues such as pollution and high energy consumption in Jakarta significantly impact the health of residents. By implementing Biofilic principles, the building incorporates natural elements like plants, contributing to health, productivity, and economic investment for the well-being of users. The objective of this research is to understand the characteristics of the biofilic concept in the South Quarter Building in South Jakarta. The method employed in this study is qualitative descriptive. South Quarter has successfully integrated natural plants and elements into its design, creating a direct connection with nature, and enhancing user comfort through a design that responds to the surrounding climate. Keywords: Architectural, Biophilic, Mixed Use
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.040 | 0.008 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".