Estimation of cerebrovascular reactivity amplitude and lag using breath-holding fMRI and the global BOLD signal: Application in diabetes and hypertension
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this work, we demonstrate a data-driven approach for estimating cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR) amplitude and lag from breathhold (BH) fMRI data alone. Our approach employs a frequency-domain approach that is independent of external recordings. CVR amplitude is estimated from the BOLD frequency spectrum and CVR lag is estimated from the Fourier phase using the global-mean BOLD signal as reference. Unlike referencing to external recordings, these lags are specific to the brain. We demonstrated our method in detecting regional CVR amplitude and lag differences across healthy (CTL), hypertensive (HT) and hypertension-plus-type-2-diabetes (HT + DM) groups of similar ages and sex ratios, with a total N of 49. We found CVR amplitude to be significantly higher in CTL compared to HT + DM, with minimal difference between CTL and HT. Also, voxelwise CVR lag estimated in the Fourier domain is a more sensitive marker of vascular dysfunction than CVR amplitude. CVR lag in HT is significantly shorter than in CTL, with minimal difference between CTL and HT + DM. Our results support the importance of joint CVR amplitude and lag assessments in clinical applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".