MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402215085 · doi:10.1109/ojcoms.2024.3454479

Spectrum Allocation for Multiuser Terahertz Communication Systems: A Machine Learning Approach

2024· article· en· W4402215085 on OpenAlexaff
Akram Shafie, Nan Yang, Chunhui Li, Xiangyun Zhou, Trung Q. Duong

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MIMO Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTerahertz radiationSpectrum (functional analysis)Computer scienceElectromagnetic spectrumArtificial intelligenceTelecommunicationsPhysicsOptoelectronicsOpticsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we propose a novel spectrum allocation design, leveraging machine learning, for multiuser communication systems operating at the terahertz (THz) band. In this design, we propose to (i) change the bandwidth of sub-bands and (ii) underutilize edge spectra of transmission windows (TWs) where the molecular absorption (MA) coefficient is very high. Different from existing studies, our design is not limited to the scenario where the MA coefficient in the spectrum designated for allocation can be accurately modeled by simply using a piecewise exponential function. We establish a constrained optimization problem and introduce an unsupervised learning approach for its solution. Through offline training, we learn a deep neural network (DNN) using a loss function inspired by the Lagrangian of the established problem. The trained DNN is then employed to derive solutions when multiuser distance parameters are given. Based on numerical analysis, we show that when the MA coefficient in the spectrum designated for allocation exhibits highly non-linear variations, our proposed approach can achieve a higher data rate than that of existing approaches which only attain approximate solutions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.871
Threshold uncertainty score0.484

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0030.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Open Journal of the Communications SocietySame topicAdvanced MIMO Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207