MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402215763 · doi:10.7202/1112159ar

L'importance de la qualité de la relation entre parent et intervenante lors d'intervention pour négligence en protection de la jeunesse

2023· article· fr· W4402215763 on OpenAlexaff
Joëlle Bouchard, Vicky Lafantaisie, Annie Bérubé

Bibliographic record

VenueTravail social. · 2023
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicChild Abuse and Trauma
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec en Outaouais
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Plusieurs parents dont les enfants sont signalés pour négligence en protection de la jeunesse ont vécu différents types de traumatismes durant l’enfance. Les répercussions de ces expériences peuvent compliquer l’établissement d’une relation positive avec leur intervenante2. Cette étude porte sur les déterminants qui influencent la qualité de la relation parent-intervenante. Des entrevues menées auprès de 37 parents montrent que les principaux déterminants de la qualité de cette relation sont les habiletés interpersonnelles de l’intervenante qui permettent un sentiment de connexion affective mutuelle, les habiletés de communication de l’intervenante et le partage du pouvoir avec le parent. Les déterminants identifiés rappellent les principes issus des pratiques sensibles au trauma.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.708
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.375
Teacher spread0.341 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTravail social.Same topicChild Abuse and TraumaFrench-language works237,207