MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402216761 · doi:10.1109/tccn.2024.3454273

Accelerating Federated Learning for Edge Intelligence Using Conjugated Central Acceleration With Inexact Global Line Search

2024· article· en· W4402216761 on OpenAlex
Lei Zhao, Lin Cai, Wu-Sheng Lu

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Cognitive Communications and Networking · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicPrivacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputer scienceAccelerationEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionLine (geometry)Artificial intelligenceMachine learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Driven by the increasing demand for real-time, low-latency learning processes and the ever-growing emphasis on data privacy, Federated Learning (FL) enabled edge intelligence emerges as a promising decentralized learning paradigm at the edge of the network, which empowers collaborative model training on edge agents, allowing them to make intelligent decisions locally without relying solely on centralized cloud servers. To enhance the training efficiency of edge agents and alleviate communication burdens, we propose a novel technique called Conjugated Central Acceleration with Inexact Line Search enabled Federated Stochastic Variance Reduced Gradient (CLSFSVRG). Conjugate Central Acceleration leverages conjugate gradient technique to efficiently utilize the training information from multiple edge agents by additional updating efforts in the central server, thereby enhancing the convergence rates of the global model and reduce the local training burden. Inexact Line Search optimizes the step size for model updates, striking a balance between precision and computational efficiency. Simulation results demonstrate that the proposed scheme outperforms the state-of-the-art FL algorithms, achieving superior performance in terms of higher test accuracy and faster convergence speed. Remarkably, our approach reduces communication costs by an impressive 82.4%, while still achieving a test accuracy of 96.5%. By allowing a small portion of edge agents to participate, CLSFSVRG exhibits higher robustness without compromising the test accuracy. Moreover, the fast convergence speed achieved with a limited number of participating edge agents contributes to significant reductions in edge computing cost during the training procedure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.987
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.147
GPT teacher head0.360
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it